LET'S TALK

Custom Software vs SaaS: A Practical Guide to Making the Right Decision for Your Team

Pablo Etcheverry on October 11, 2025

Cover Image

Custom software vs SaaS: A practical build vs buy software guide for modern teams

Estimated reading time: 12 minutes

Key takeaways

  • Buy for commodity, standard problems where speed matters.
  • Build when workflows or customer experiences are differentiators and you need control over data, roadmap, or IP.
  • Hybrid often wins: use SaaS rails and build custom glue, dashboards, or microservices where latency, logic, or UX demand it.
  • Model TCO over 3–5 years and prioritize high ROI slices first.

Section 1 — Software leverage: why this decision matters

Choosing between custom software vs SaaS isn’t just a tech choice. It’s a decision about leverage and fit. The right call lets your team do more with less, move faster, and keep control where it matters. The wrong call slows growth and locks your workflows into someone else’s box.

Think of software leverage as a growth engine alongside labor and capital. People and money scale linearly. Code and media don’t. They’re permissionless leverage—you write code once, and it keeps working while you sleep.

“Code compounds output.” Naval’s leverage pyramid makes this concrete: labor and capital are linear; code and media are non-linear.

For most companies, leverage shows up in boring, beautiful ways: automation that trims hours into minutes, handoffs that go from days to clicks, dashboards that turn gut-feel into action. When the tool fits like a glove, the payoff is real.

Section 2 — Off-the-shelf software vs custom: definitions and context

Off-the-shelf / SaaS tools are built for the masses: sign up, configure, and get value fast. Vendors handle updates, hosting, and security. Great for standard jobs where best practices are known.

Custom software is built for your unique needs. It mirrors your processes, gives you control over features and data models, and evolves with your business.

Both exist for a reason. Generic tools optimize for breadth; custom optimizes for depth. When you’re connecting hardware and tooling—like pairing an ESP32 device with a dashboard that pushes OTA updates—the off-the-shelf approach often won’t cut it. See how Bench Sentry blended IoT, remote control, and tracking with a custom stack or how Kinetico built for industrial-grade telemetry.

Section 3 — Build vs buy software: a decision framework

Time-to-value is the first lens. Need outcomes in weeks? Buy. Can you invest months to shape a tailored outcome that compounds for years? Build.

Process uniqueness: If your workflows are a true differentiator, build. If the process is commodity, buy.

Integration complexity often pushes hybrid. Deep data orchestration and event-driven flows can break with superficial connectors; a focused custom layer can restore flow.

Control & roadmap: Need to own features and data model? Build. Ok with vendor roadmaps? Buy.

Budget & TCO—SaaS is cheaper up front but subscriptions and workarounds add up. Custom is front-loaded but can be cheaper over 5–10 years if it replaces many licenses.

Risk tolerance & team readiness: SaaS demands less maturity. Custom needs product leadership and an ops plan. A staged approach—start SaaS, add custom where it hurts—works well.

Rule of thumb: buy for commodity capabilities, build for differentiating workflows, and use hybrid for glue and extensions.

Section 4 — When to build custom software

Two primary reasons to build: 1) you’re creating a product to sell, or 2) you’re strengthening internal operations with bespoke internal tools.

Triggers — You outgrow generic tools, spend more time working around them than in them, face heavy manual exports/imports, or have compliance/data ownership needs vendors can’t meet.

Benefits: fit first, advantage next, and upside from owning IP. Examples:

  • Healthcare: Recovery Delivered needed a HIPAA-safe telemedicine flow—appointments, video, e‑prescriptions, records—so we built the platform to fit care delivery.
  • CRM: REE Medical unified personalized forms and workflows that generic CRMs couldn’t handle cleanly.
  • IoT: Bench Sentry paired devices over WiFi/Bluetooth and handled real-time events—classic build territory; see also Kinetico.
  • AI-driven UX: Mena Homes shows how tailored experiences around LLMs can be core to product value.

If these feel familiar—outgrowing SaaS, needing integration and data control—you’re likely in build mode.

Section 5 — When to choose SaaS (off-the-shelf)

SaaS shines for standard processes: email, payroll, HRIS, basic CRM, ticketing. You get speed, vendor support, and often better security posture than a small team can achieve day one.

Cost efficiency is real at early stages. Get live fast, learn from users, and avoid heavy upfront spend.

To avoid future constraints, choose tools with robust APIs, webhooks, and good export options. Favor configuration over heavy customization so you can extend later. For example, Mena Homes integrated OpenAI in a way that played nicely with their data.

SaaS vs custom is not binary: if the job is standard and speed matters, SaaS is your friend—pick vendors that won’t box you in later.

Section 6 — Hybrid strategies: the pragmatic middle

Most modern stacks are hybrid: SaaS for commodity functions plus a small custom layer for orchestration, automation, or unified UX.

Examples:

  • Hoober built an analytics hub that pulls listings, revenue, and leads into one dashboard with KPIs that make decisions obvious.
  • Payments: lean on Stripe for rails, build marketplace logic and KYC on top—MySide is a good model (MySide).
  • IoT + cloud: use cloud scale where it fits and a bespoke command center for control—see Bench Sentry and Kinetico.

iPaaS and low-code tools can accelerate the early glue work; graduate to microservices when scale or latency require it.

Section 7 — Economics and ROI: modeling the decision

Model the money before you write code. TCO is your first lens: subscriptions, integrations, storage, and hidden workaround costs for SaaS; discovery, build, testing, hosting, and maintenance for custom.

Measure returns: cycle time, error rate, throughput. If a task drops from 30 minutes to 5 minutes and runs 2,000 times a month, you’ve freed about 1,000 hours a year. Multiply by loaded hourly cost to quantify savings.

Use a simple payback model: build cost ÷ monthly savings = months to payback. Sensitivity test adoption to avoid rosy math.

Dashboards make impact visible. Pull from SaaS, a warehouse, or device telemetry. Hoober’s real-time dashboard is a useful pattern.

Don’t forget IP upside: owning proprietary software can lift exit multiples and reduce dependency risk. Examples: MySide and Flower Arranger show marketplace and payments patterns that protect long-term value.

Consider scale effects: SaaS often climbs with seats/usage; custom is front-loaded and may get cheaper per user as you grow.

Section 8 — Who should build it: in-house vs consultancy development

In-house gives deep domain fit and day-to-day control. Trade-off: time to hire and onboard, and carrying management load.

Consultancy brings speed and senior cross-functional teams on day one, plus battle-tested patterns. Trade-off: daily cost and the need for governance—protect IP and require documentation.

Many teams choose a hybrid: keep product ownership and SMEs inside, bring a partner to accelerate design and build, then pass the baton with docs and runbooks. That’s the model we favor at Imajine.

Regulated work benefits from experienced partners. Recovery Delivered compressed risk by using a team experienced in secure video, e‑scripts, and records.

Section 9 — Implementation roadmap for a successful custom build

  1. Discovery: map workflows, pain points, and edge cases. Sit with users and create a service blueprint.
  2. Prioritize by ROI: pick 2–3 high-value use cases with clear success metrics.
  3. Design architecture: integration map, data model, security plan, and decisions about SaaS vs custom. For device projects, plan cloud IoT and OTA updates; see Bench Sentry and Kinetico.
  4. Deliver iteratively: prototype, test with users, build in short cycles, use feature flags.
  5. Change management: simple guides, short videos, training sessions, and champions per team. For AR or on‑site tools, short demos help—see Glaziers Tools.
  6. Operate & evolve: monitoring, alerts, logging, shared KPIs, and a backlog for continuous improvement.

Section 10 — Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

  • Overbuilding version one: aim for the smallest slice that proves the outcome; validate with manual steps if possible.
  • Fuzzy requirements: appoint a product owner, write crisp stories with acceptance criteria, and triage scope weekly.
  • Underestimating integrations: test API limits, webhooks, and do dry runs for migrations.
  • UX debt: put real users in front of prototypes and fix the paper cuts early.
  • Ignoring maintenance: budget for upgrades, patches, and performance tuning.
  • Vendor lock-in: mitigate with standards, APIs, and exportable data.

Section 11 — Quick self-assessment checklist: custom software vs SaaS

Answer these to move from debate to a testable plan:

  • Is this capability core to how we win, or is it a commodity?
  • Are current tools slowing growth, quality, or compliance?
  • Do we need deep customization, integrations, or strict data control?
  • Do we have product leadership and budget to build and maintain?
  • Would owning this IP improve valuation or exit options?
  • Given the answers, is our decision Buy, Build, or Hybrid, and why?

Write down your call and the top three assumptions behind it. That converts a vague debate into a clear plan to test.

Conclusion and next steps

The right choice in custom software vs SaaS is about leverage, fit, and control. Buy where the job is standard and speed matters. Build where your process is your edge. Use hybrid to stitch it together with a calm, durable core.

Practical next steps:

  • Map current workflows.
  • Quantify the drag from today’s tools.
  • Model TCO and payback.
  • Run a small, high‑ROI pilot to prove the outcome before scaling.

If you want a second set of eyes, our team at Imajine is happy to help. We’ve shipped HIPAA‑compliant telemedicine, IoT dashboards with OTA updates, AI‑assisted search, AR visualizations, analytics hubs, and Stripe Connect marketplaces. Our initial consultation is free—share your goals and we’ll outline a Buy, Build, or Hybrid path.

FAQs

Is custom software always more expensive?

Not always over the full lifecycle. Custom costs more up front but can cost less over 3–5 years if it replaces multiple subscriptions, removes manual work, and lifts conversion. Biggest drivers are scope, integrations, security needs, and how often the product changes.

How long does a custom build take, and how do we de‑risk timelines?

Small, focused tools can ship in 6–12 weeks. Complex platforms can take several months. De‑risk with a tight MVP, short sprints, weekly demos, and feature flags. Ship value in slices, not one big bang.

Where do low‑code and no‑code tools fit?

Great for early validation, internal apps, and admin portals. Build a proof of concept fast, then harden the pieces that need scale or custom logic. Many teams keep a mix long term: low‑code for simple forms and dashboards, custom for core logic.

Can we start with SaaS and migrate later?

Yes. It’s a smart path. Choose tools with strong APIs and clean exports. Keep domain logic in a thin custom layer where possible so you can swap SaaS parts or replace them with custom services without breaking users.

How do we protect IP and ensure knowledge transfer when using a consultancy?

Set IP terms in the contract. Require code in your repos, detailed documentation, architecture diagrams, and runbooks. Ask for a formal handover and joint on‑call for the first weeks. Pair your engineers with the partner during the build so context stays in‑house.

How do we measure ROI after launch?

Track baseline metrics before you start. After launch, watch cycle time, error rate, support tickets, NPS, and revenue or margin changes. Use an analytics dashboard so everyone sees progress. Hoober’s KPI model is a good reference for visibility.

What about hardware‑software projects in IoT?

Plan the full stack: firmware, connectivity, cloud, and apps. Use proven boards like ESP32 for Bluetooth and WiFi, and build a web dashboard for alerts and OTA updates. Bench Sentry and Kinetico show the pattern end to end.

Model Context Protocol (MCP): Connect ChatGPT Seamlessly to Google Calendar, Sheets, Slack, and More

Pablo Etcheverry on October 11, 2025

Cover Image

Model Context Protocol (MCP): The simplest way to connect ChatGPT to Google Calendar, Sheets, Slack, and Blender

Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

Key takeaways

  • MCP is a single, standard bridge that lets an LLM orchestrate external tools with natural language.
  • Provider-backed servers mean you configure once and avoid bespoke connector maintenance.
  • Workflows can chain across Calendar, Sheets, Slack, and even local tools like Blender.
  • Safety relies on least-privilege scopes, service accounts, and dry-run previews before commits.

What is MCP? MCP explained

Model Context Protocol is a simple standard that lets an AI assistant “talk” to external apps through MCP servers. You describe the outcome you want. The LLM turns your words into tool calls. The MCP servers (run by providers like Google and Slack) do the work and send results back.

The core idea is straightforward: connect an LLM to external tools without writing custom code for every single app. One protocol. Many tools. Natural language on top.

Why it’s trending: the hard parts are finally standardized and maintained by providers. Authenticate once. Approve scopes once. Then orchestrate Calendar, Sheets, Slack, and more with the same approach.

Compared to plugins or one-off integrations, MCP gives you:

  • One protocol instead of many bespoke connectors.
  • Provider-managed servers instead of DIY maintenance.
  • A unified permissions model you can reason about and audit.

How Model Context Protocol (MCP) works (under the hood, but simple)

Components

There are three main pieces:

  • The LLM client (for example, ChatGPT) where you type your request.
  • MCP servers provided by each service (Google for Calendar/Drive, Slack for messaging).
  • A shared message format the LLM uses to call those tools — under the hood it’s JSON-RPC 2.0 over standard transports (STDIO for local tools, HTTP for remote ones).

Workflow

You ask in natural language. The LLM converts intent into MCP calls. The MCP servers execute the operations—read the calendar, update the sheet, post in Slack—and return structured results. The LLM reads the results, reasons about next steps, and can chain more calls. One prompt can fan out across multiple tools, then converge back into a single, clean update for you.

Key advantages

You configure connections once, providers maintain them, and the assistant orchestrates across apps in one go. If you’ve ever thought, “I just wish ChatGPT could do the thing in my actual tools,” this is that wish, formalized.

Real-world scenario (Pepe’s handoff)

Meet Pepe, a project coordinator. His old routine took ~45 minutes: scan Google Calendars, update a Google Sheets tracker, post meeting details in Slack, and monitor replies. With MCP + ChatGPT, Pepe types one prompt and the LLM checks calendars, updates Sheets, and posts in Slack — all in under a minute. The invites are correct, the sheet is fresh, and the channel gets a tidy summary.

At Imajine, we see this pattern across teams every day. It’s why we build dashboards that show state at a glance, like on Hoober. MCP extends that clarity into action: your LLM not only reports status—it updates it.

MCP tutorial — How to use MCP with ChatGPT

Prerequisites

You need an LLM client that supports MCP (e.g., ChatGPT) and accounts for the tools you want to connect: Google Calendar, Google Sheets, Slack. Ensure you or your admin has the right permissions. If you plan to add Blender later, confirm local access to scenes and assets.

Configuration basics

Open your LLM client’s connector settings and authenticate to each provider’s MCP server. It feels like a normal OAuth sign-in. Approve only the scopes you need (read/write events for Calendar, read/write for Sheets, message posting for Slack). Providers maintain the server — you don’t write code or babysit tokens day to day.

First-run checklist

  • Tell the LLM which calendars to check and the timezone to use.
  • Specify the sheet and tab for your tracker and the meaning of each column.
  • Identify the Slack channel for updates and whether posts should be threaded or pinned.

Example natural-language prompts

  • “Find a 30-minute slot tomorrow morning when the engineering team is available and schedule a ‘handoff review.’”
  • “Update the project tracker in Google Sheets with completed tasks from the last 24 hours and summarize progress.”
  • “Post an urgent meeting reminder in Slack with the sheet link and ask for confirmations.”

If you already ship LLM tools and want a head start, check how we approached LLM-led workflows on Mena Homes. The same natural-language patterns carry over to MCP orchestration.

A quick note on trust and safety: run a dry run. Ask, “Show me what you plan to change before you commit.” The LLM will preview event details, ranges in Sheets, and the Slack message. Confirm, then let it execute.

From here, move into specific playbooks. In the next sections we’ll cover integrations with Google Calendar & Sheets, Slack, Blender, and advanced developer flows.

Integration specifics

MCP integration with Google Calendar and Sheets

Calendar gets smarter when the LLM can read and write your schedule. With MCP you can scan multiple calendars for overlapping availability, create events with Meet links, invite attendees, reschedule, or cancel from one prompt. Ask for constraints like time zones, working hours, or room resources, and the MCP server will return valid options.

Sheets works the same way: fetch rows by filters, append entries, update statuses, and pull computed values from formula cells. Good patterns:

  • Name tabs clearly and lock down ranges you expect to touch.
  • Ask the assistant to show the rows it will change before committing.
  • Wire a summary step: “Compute percent complete and return it as a KPI.”

We use this approach on tools like Hoober to surface KPIs where work happens, not in a separate tool.

MCP Slack integration

Slack becomes a broadcast and coordination layer. With MCP the assistant can post announcements, reply in threads, pin messages, or DM owners who missed updates. Best practices:

  • Create a test channel first, then invite the bot to production channels where automation is allowed.
  • Use threads for rollups: a single post with a tidy thread for follow-ups.
  • Mention stakeholders by handle so they can confirm.

If you need a blueprint for channel hygiene with analytics, see the Mena Homes dashboard pattern where summaries and KPIs keep people aligned without spam.

MCP Blender integration

MCP can drive local tools like Blender. The assistant can open a scene, change materials, tweak object positions, render stills or animations, and export assets. Example prompt: “Open product-template.blend, swap the material to our five brand colors, render at 1080p with the studio camera, and save to /assets/variants.”

Always ask for a dry run report listing file path, camera, samples, and output size before rendering.

Advanced workflows — MCP with Cursor and Python

Cursor brings MCP into your editor so you can chain steps without leaving code. Treat each tool call as a check: verify the Calendar slot, validate the Sheets result, then proceed. This gating pattern makes workflows predictable.

Python adds scheduling and storage. Example: a cron job checks logs hourly, writes anomalies to a “Production Incidents” sheet, creates a Calendar event for on-call, and posts a Slack alert with a chart link. Add idempotency by comparing hashes and retries with backoff for robustness.

For physical-world connections, extend MCP to local servers that talk to devices (we’ve done this with ESP32, Bluetooth, and WiFi on Bench Sentry and Kinetico Pro). The pattern is the same: MCP client calls a local server, the server talks to hardware, and returns a clean result for the LLM to reason about.

Security, privacy, and governance

Principles:

  • Grant least privilege — use calendar.readonly unless write is necessary.
  • Use dedicated service accounts for automations, not personal logins.
  • Keep version history and audit logs enabled for Sheets, Calendar, and Slack.
  • Enforce SSO and rotate tokens on a schedule for enterprise rollouts.

Separate identities and role-based access make audits and offboarding safe. The MCP server executes actions with approved scopes and returns only the data needed for the assistant to reason and respond.

Who should use Model Context Protocol (MCP) and when

MCP helps people who repeat multi-app work:

  • Project coordinators
  • Product managers
  • Support leads
  • Marketing teams that render variants and schedule launches
  • Solo creators who want a light studio assistant

It shines when steps are known but details change: weekly standups, monthly reporting, sprint demos, campaign checklists, and status aggregation. If you manage assets, MCP can churn through renders while you focus on creative choices.

Alternatives and comparisons

Traditional APIs: give full control but cost time and maintenance. MCP trades low-level control for speed and low upkeep.

No-code automations (Zap-like): good for simple triggers but limited in flexible reasoning. MCP + ChatGPT can infer and choose the best action before acting.

Success metrics and rollout plan

Measure:

  • Time saved per run (e.g., 45 minutes → 1 minute).
  • Error rates (missed invites, stale statuses).
  • Data freshness (average age of Last Updated).

Rollout plan:

  1. Start small: pick one high-friction workflow and document the manual path.
  2. Build the MCP version and run both for two weeks.
  3. Capture working prompts as templates and add guardrails like “preview before commit.”
  4. When stable, expand to the next workflow and add advanced integrations (Blender, CRM, IoT) later.

For CRM-heavy teams, our REE Medical case study shows how to unify fragmented data and personalized forms; the same discipline helps when you bring MCP into customer ops.

FAQ

Do I have to maintain the connections myself?

No. Providers maintain their MCP servers. You authenticate once, approve scopes, and you’re set. You may re-auth when tokens expire, but you don’t host or patch the servers.

Why am I seeing permission errors?

Most likely your scopes don’t cover the action. calendar.readonly can’t create events. A Slack bot without channel access can’t post. Edit the connection, add needed scopes, and invite the bot to the right channels.

What if APIs rate limit me?

Batch changes and space calls out. Queue Slack posts. For Sheets, group row updates by range rather than single-cell writes. If volume is high, spread runs across time windows.

The sheet update failed with a range error. What now?

Use exact sheet, tab, and A1 ranges. Names like “Q1 tracker” vs “2025-Q1-Projects” cause misses. Keep a canonical reference doc of IDs for calendars, sheets, and channels. Have the assistant read the first five rows to validate before writing.

Can MCP work offline or with flaky internet?

Local tools can use STDIO, so you can operate against Blender or a local script offline. For cloud tools, queue actions. Ask for explicit success confirmations and retry on reconnect.

How is this different from plugins?

Plugins are bespoke to one app. MCP is one protocol many tools share. It uses a standard message format and provider-run servers, so you get a single mental model for permissions, calls, and logs.

Can I run a private MCP server?

Yes — useful for local tools or internal systems. Expose specific functions, handle auth on your side, and the assistant calls your server like any other. This is common for on-prem or regulated data.

Is MCP safe for enterprise?

Treat it like any integration: least-privilege scopes, SSO, token rotation, sandbox testing, and audit logs. Separate service accounts from human users. With these basics, MCP can meet enterprise needs.

Can MCP control IoT devices like ESP32?

Yes, through a local or remote MCP server that talks to your hardware libraries over Bluetooth or WiFi. See Bench Sentry for remote control and package tracking, and Kinetico Pro for commercial sensor data at scale.

Does Blender need to stay open during renders?

If the MCP server launches Blender headless, it will manage the process for you. If you attach to a running instance, keep it open until jobs finish. Always validate file paths and render settings in a dry run first.

How do I audit changes?

Rely on native logs: Google Sheets version history and Calendar change logs show who changed what and when. Slack audit logs track bot messages. Keep MCP request/response logs when you need deeper forensics.

Conclusion

Model Context Protocol (MCP) turns natural-language instructions into coordinated actions across Calendar, Sheets, Slack, and even Blender. Describe the goal. The assistant reasons, calls the right tools, and reports back with results you can trust.

If you want a fast win, pick one workflow, run the MCP tutorial steps, and ship your first end-to-end prompt in ChatGPT. When you’re ready for advanced prompts in Cursor and Python, analytics dashboards, or IoT control, we can help. Imajine has shipped AI/ML products like Mena Homes, dashboards like Hoober, AR visual tools like Glaziers Tools, and IoT platforms using ESP32, Bluetooth, and WiFi such as Bench Sentry and Kinetico Pro.

Our initial consultation is free — tell us your workflow and we’ll help design a safe, clear rollout for MCP that saves hours every week.

HIPAA Compliant GPT: How to Set Up Using AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Azure OpenAI

Pablo Etcheverry on October 11, 2025

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

Key takeaways

  • You can run a HIPAA compliant GPT today if you use cloud providers that sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA).
  • Top HIPAA-friendly platforms: AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Azure OpenAI—each offers enterprise controls and data-use guarantees.
  • Pricing is often comparable to direct vendor rates; expect small extra costs for networking, logging, and fine-tuning hosting.
  • Follow a practical checklist: BAA, private networking, encryption (CMEK/KMS), strict IAM, audit logging, and PHI minimization.

Opening (hook + promise)

HIPAA compliant GPT does not require you to avoid GPT, Claude, or Gemini. You can run a HIPAA compliant GPT today.

Here’s the key: use cloud providers that sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) and offer enterprise-grade controls. That’s how you protect PHI, keep audit trails, and ensure your data isn’t used to train public models.

In this guide you’ll get:

  • Which providers to use — AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, Azure OpenAI
  • Model options — Claude, GPT‑4, Gemini — and HIPAA-compliant AI posture
  • Real pricing realities
  • A practical setup checklist you can follow this week

Keep scrolling for the exact steps and tradeoffs that matter in the real world.

HIPAA basics for AI usage

HIPAA focuses on PHI data protection. For AI, that means:

  • Safeguards: encryption, access controls, and breach response
  • Data handling: limit who sees PHI and why; keep audit logs
  • Accountability: prove what happened, when, and by whom

Why a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) matters:

  • A BAA binds the provider to HIPAA rules
  • It enforces proper PHI handling and breach duties
  • It is the contract layer that makes HIPAA compliant LLMs possible at scale

Helpful context on HIPAA security expectations:

The three main HIPAA-friendly routes to top models

AWS Bedrock (HIPAA)

What you can use:

  • Anthropic Claude (e.g., Sonnet, Opus)
  • Meta Llama, Amazon Titan, and more

Why teams choose it:

Where it shines: Fast access to the newest Claude models and strong PHI data protection controls out of the box.

Google Vertex AI (HIPAA)

What you can use: Gemini (Pro, Flash), select PaLM, and open-source models.

Why teams choose it:

Where it shines: Gemini for fast, cost-effective reasoning and tight integration with Google Cloud security.

Azure OpenAI (HIPAA)

What you can use: GPT‑4 family, GPT‑4 Turbo, DALL·E, and more.

Why teams choose it:

Where it shines: Organizations standardized on Microsoft security and easy policy enforcement with Azure Policy and logging.

Pricing reality check (cost is comparable to going direct)

Good news: HIPAA compliant GPT does not have to be pricey. In many cases, you’ll pay similar rates to going direct.

What we see in the field:

Extra costs to watch:

  • Fine-tuned model hosting and training fees (watch Azure OpenAI hosting costs: Azure pricing).
  • Egress/networking, logging, and key management across clouds.

Takeaway: With a BAA and enterprise controls, HIPAA compliant AI can be cost-parity with direct vendor APIs—without sacrificing PHI data protection.

Implementation experience and setup flow

If you’ve built on OpenAI/Anthropic/Google APIs, building on Bedrock, Vertex AI, or Azure OpenAI will feel familiar. The main difference is extra guardrails: auth, network, and logging.

What changes:

  • Auth and identity: use IAM (AWS), IAM (GCP), or Entra ID/RBAC (Azure)
  • Networking: private endpoints/VPC/VNet to keep traffic off the public internet
  • Logging and keys: centralized audit logs and KMS/CMEK everywhere

Practical setup checklist

  • Choose your provider(s) based on your primary models (Claude → AWS Bedrock, GPT‑4 → Azure OpenAI, Gemini → Vertex AI).
  • Execute a Business Associate Agreement (HIPAA BAA for AI) with your cloud provider.
  • Configure dedicated enterprise infrastructure:
  • Lock down data-use settings:
  • Implement PHI minimization/redaction:
    • Drop identifiers you don’t need (name, MRN, SSN).
    • Use pattern-based redaction or de-identification before prompts.
    • Re-identify only on the client or secure service layer.
  • Enforce least privilege and secret hygiene: fine-grained IAM, rotate keys, store secrets in KMS/Key Vault/Secret Manager.
  • Document everything for audits: data flows, subprocessors, retention policy, access reviews, incident response, and model cards/use cases.

Tip: Think in layers: network isolation, encryption, identity, logging, and data-use controls. Each layer blocks a different risk. Together, they create robust enterprise AI security.

Access and approval timelines (what to expect)

Access isn’t hard, but timing varies by provider and account history.

What teams report:

  • AWS Bedrock: often immediate once the service is enabled in your account/region.
  • Google Vertex AI: usually available right away; some orgs see 1–2 business days for quota increases.
  • Azure OpenAI: access requires approval; typical is ~1 business day, sometimes longer based on use case.

If you need day-one access to brand-new models, there are tradeoffs and workarounds. In the next sections we cover model availability timing, a medical transcription case study, and a quick-start guide you can run this week.

Tradeoffs vs. going direct to model vendors

Model availability timing

  • New models don’t always land everywhere at once.
  • AWS Bedrock often gets new Claude releases quickly; Gemini updates land in Vertex AI first; GPT‑4 family updates arrive in Azure OpenAI after OpenAI.com.
  • Expect a lag from a few days to several weeks depending on provider and region.

When day-one access matters

If you need immediate access for research or feature testing, going direct to a model vendor may be faster — but direct APIs usually don’t include a BAA or full enterprise controls you need for PHI protection.

For production with PHI, the safer path is AWS Bedrock HIPAA, Google Vertex AI HIPAA, or Azure OpenAI HIPAA with a signed BAA and private networking.

Mitigations: get the best of both

  • Run a multi-provider strategy: prototype on whichever service has the newest model, then move to your HIPAA-compliant stack before real PHI traffic.
  • Keep a portable prompt and schema: use a consistent JSON output spec across providers.
  • Build a thin adapter layer: one interface, many backends (Bedrock, Vertex, Azure).
  • Lock in controls, not vendors: make network, IAM, logging, and DLP the foundation so you can swap models without reopening compliance work.

Real-world case study: HIPAA-compliant medical transcription app

Context

A multi-site medical group wanted fast, accurate clinical notes from visit audio. Strict PHI rules, detailed audit logs, and no training on customer data. Goals: clean transcripts, smart editing, and safe clinician chat.

Architecture choices

  • Speech-to-text: existing ASR vendor output sent into secure cloud storage.
  • Transcript cleanup and structure: Claude via AWS Bedrock for sectioning, grammar, and SOAP note formatting.
  • Chat-based editing and Q&A: Gemini via Google Vertex AI for quick follow-ups and formatting tweaks.
  • Why these picks: Claude quality on Bedrock and Gemini low-latency chat on Vertex (Bedrock data privacy, Vertex data governance).

Data flow (PHI-aware)

  1. Upload audio and ASR text to a private bucket with CMEK/KMS encryption.
  2. Run de-identification on obvious identifiers before LLM calls when possible.
  3. Send batched, minimized text to Claude on Bedrock via PrivateLink.
  4. Store LLM outputs with audit logs (CloudTrail/CloudWatch or Cloud Logging).
  5. Provide an editor UI where staff ask Gemini for changes.
  6. Re-identify only at the secure service layer, then export to EHR.

Security and governance

  • Private networking end to end: AWS PrivateLink and Google Private Service Connect/VPC Service Controls (AWS PrivateLink, Google VPC SC).
  • Keys in KMS/CMEK; strict IAM/RBAC roles; secrets in Key Vault/Secret Manager equivalents.
  • Model data-use controls disabled by default; no training on customer data (Bedrock data privacy, Vertex governance).

Outcome

  • Clinicians received cleaner drafts in seconds, with fewer edits.
  • PHI stayed in HIPAA-eligible services under a Business Associate Agreement.
  • Cost was near vendor direct rates, plus small spend for networking and logs.
  • The team kept the option to add Azure OpenAI later for GPT‑4 features while keeping Azure OpenAI HIPAA guardrails (Azure data privacy).

Advanced options and extensibility

Host or customize models

  • Bedrock supports multiple foundation models and enterprise controls; check HIPAA eligibility for any new capability before using PHI (AWS HIPAA reference).
  • Vertex AI supports tuning and grounding with enterprise governance; align scopes with VPC Service Controls and DLP (Vertex governance).
  • Azure OpenAI supports fine-tuning and model deployments with private networking and Key Vault integration (Azure private networking).

Fine-tuning within HIPAA constraints

  • Use de-identified datasets for training when possible.
  • Keep raw PHI in your VPC/VNet and apply strict access controls.
  • Budget for fine-tune hosting and training costs, especially on Azure OpenAI (Azure pricing).

Observability and governance add‑ons

  • Centralize logs: CloudTrail/CloudWatch, Cloud Logging, Azure Monitor.
  • Add DLP and redaction at ingress and egress.
  • Human review queues for sensitive outputs (e.g., discharge notes).
  • Regular access reviews and incident runbooks to back your HIPAA compliant AI controls (HIPAA security guidance).

Quick-start guide: Make your GPT deployment HIPAA-compliant

  • Decide your workloads: transcription cleanup, SOAP notes, patient summaries, chat, coding suggestions.
  • Pick your models: Claude for structured clinical writing; GPT‑4 on Azure for broad reasoning; Gemini for fast chat.
  • Choose providers: AWS Bedrock HIPAA for Claude; Google Vertex AI HIPAA for Gemini; Azure OpenAI HIPAA for GPT‑4.
  • Execute your HIPAA BAA for AI: Ensure the services you’ll use are in scope under the BAA (AWS, Google, Microsoft).
  • Set up enterprise AI security: Private endpoints (PrivateLink, Private Service Connect/VPC SC, Azure Private Link), TLS and KMS/CMEK, and audit every call.
  • Lock down data-use: Confirm prompts and completions aren’t used to train models (AWS, Google, Azure).
  • Minimize PHI: Redact unnecessary identifiers; re-identify only inside your secure app.
  • Pilot and scale: Validate latency, cost, and quality; add rate limits, retries, and circuit breakers; document data flows and retention for audits.

FAQ

Are GPT or Claude HIPAA compliant by default?

No. The models themselves are not “HIPAA compliant” on their own. Compliance comes from how you deploy them: under a BAA, with enterprise controls, and with safeguards around PHI. Using HIPAA-eligible services like Bedrock, Vertex AI, or Azure OpenAI is the usual path.

Do OpenAI or Anthropic sign BAAs via standard APIs?

Most teams do not rely on direct vendor APIs for PHI because a BAA and enterprise controls are not typically available in standard self-serve plans. Instead, teams use cloud providers that sign a BAA and provide network isolation, IAM, and audit logging.

Will my PHI be used to train models?

On HIPAA-eligible cloud services, providers state that prompts and completions are not used to train foundation models. Always verify and disable any data retention features (AWS, Google, Azure).

Is running local LLMs safer than cloud?

It can be, but only if you match enterprise AI security: physical security, encryption, RBAC, patching, high availability, monitoring, and incident response. For most teams, HIPAA-eligible cloud services with a BAA are faster and safer to operate at scale (HIPAA security guidance).

What’s the cost difference between HIPAA compliant LLMs and direct APIs?

Often small to none. Azure OpenAI typically aligns with OpenAI pricing; Bedrock pricing for Anthropic models is similar to Anthropic direct; Vertex AI is close to Google’s public rates. Expect extra spend for networking, logging, and fine-tuned model hosting (Azure pricing, OpenAI pricing, Bedrock pricing, Anthropic pricing, Vertex pricing).

Can I use multiple cloud providers at once?

Yes. Many teams mix AWS Bedrock for Claude, Vertex AI for Gemini, and Azure OpenAI for GPT‑4. Build a small abstraction layer and keep prompts portable to avoid lock-in.

How long does it take to get access?

  • Bedrock: often immediate after enabling the service (getting started).
  • Vertex AI: usually immediate; quotas may take 1–2 business days (quotas).
  • Azure OpenAI: approval is required; many teams see about one business day (Azure OpenAI access).

What controls matter most for PHI data protection?

Private networking, encryption with CMEK/KMS, strict IAM/RBAC, audit logs, and clear data-use settings that prevent training on your data. Add DLP and PHI minimization for defense in depth (HIPAA guidance).

Conclusion and next steps

You can ship HIPAA compliant GPT today. Use HIPAA-eligible services with a signed Business Associate Agreement, then layer network isolation, encryption, IAM, logging, and data-use controls. AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Azure OpenAI give you top models—Claude, Gemini, and GPT‑4—without sacrificing PHI data protection.

A smart path: start where your must-have model lives, keep prompts portable, move production PHI to the cloud that gives you the BAA and controls you need, and revisit your mix as models and prices change.

If you want help standing this up, grab our checklist, subscribe for practical updates, or reach out. We’ll get your first HIPAA compliant AI workflow live this week—and your HIPAA compliant GPT stack ready for scale.

This website uses cookies
Imajine relies on cookies to improve your online experience. Cookies are used to play videos, and to analyze our website traffic.

Allow cookies
Privacy policy